Uganda’s Supreme Court has temporarily halted enforcement actions in the Bitature loan dispute, granting Patrick Bitature and his Simba Group a reprieve in their ongoing Shs 35 billion legal battle with South Africa’s Vantage Mezzanine Fund II Partnership. The interim order allows the business mogul time to pursue a full appeal before Uganda’s highest court.
Justice Elizabeth Musoke, sitting as a single justice, issued the ruling on Thursday, staying execution of an earlier Court of Appeal decision that had permitted Vantage to enforce a $10 million loan agreement signed in 2014. The judge said the order was necessary “to preserve the status quo” until the Supreme Court determines whether the appeal should proceed.
“The main purpose of an interim order is preservation of the status quo to avoid rendering nugatory the determination of the substantive application,” Justice Musoke stated in her ruling, delivered electronically. She rejected arguments that enforcement was not imminent, noting that “every successful party has an interest in ensuring the immediate execution of a decree.”
Supreme Court Halts Enforcement in Bitature Loan Dispute
The Bitature loan dispute originates from a 2014 deal in which Vantage extended a $10 million facility to Simba Properties Investment Co. Ltd, guaranteed by Patrick and Carol Bitature and several affiliated firms. The loan was secured against valuable real estate and equity holdings across the Simba Group portfolio.
Following an alleged default, Vantage sought arbitration under the London International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), which ruled in its favor in 2023. The fund then moved to enforce the arbitral award in Uganda, obtaining interim injunctions from the High Court to prevent Simba from restructuring ownership or selling mortgaged assets.
Simba appealed to the Court of Appeal, arguing that the enforcement violated Ugandan law. However, in August 2025, the appellate court sided with Vantage, striking out Simba’s appeal, citing that Uganda’s Arbitration and Conciliation Act bars appeals against such orders.
Thursday’s ruling by Justice Musoke revives the company’s legal position, giving it breathing space to pursue a substantive appeal before the full Supreme Court bench.
Implications for Business and Arbitration
For Bitature, one of Uganda’s most recognizable entrepreneurs, the Bitature loan dispute represents both a financial and reputational challenge. He has consistently argued that the COVID-19 pandemic severely affected his businesses, particularly in hospitality and real estate, making it difficult to meet repayment timelines.
The ruling has far-reaching implications beyond Bitature’s empire. Legal analysts say the decision will influence how Ugandan courts handle cross-border financing, arbitration awards, and foreign creditor enforcement. “The interim stay buys time,” noted a Kampala financial lawyer, “but the final Supreme Court verdict will determine Uganda’s future credibility in international investment arbitration.”
For now, the interim order grants Simba Group a vital pause, shielding its assets as the Bitature loan dispute continues to shape Uganda’s business and legal landscape.

